Border
Environment Cooperation Commission
Wastewater Collection System Rehabilitation and
Improvements Project
Tijuana, Baja California
1.
Project Type
The project consists of the rehabilitation of
approximately 131,000 meters of wastewater collection lines, which represents
approximately 7.5% of the total length of the citys system.
2. Project Location
The
project is located in the city of Tijuana in the state of Baja California. All the components of the project are
located within the watershed of the Tijuana River, which flows into the United States
and reaches the Pacific Ocean through the Tijuana Estuary. According to the 2000 Census, Tijuana has a
population of 1,210,820. The Consejo
Estatal de Población (CONEPO) has official population projections through
the year 2010. It is expected that
Tijuana will reach a population of 1,424,426 by that year. If the population growth rate of 2.1% per
year utilized by CONEPO for the period 2005-2010 is extrapolated for the next
decade, a population projection of 1,755,138 for the year 2020 is obtained.
3. Project Description and Tasks.
The proposed project is composed of 50 specific projects for the
rehabilitation of sewer laterals, collectors and sub-collectors. Overall, 131,000 meters of sewer lines will be
rehabilitated with lines varying in diameter from 20 to 122 cm. Of the 50
projects, 36 involve the rehabilitation of laterals, 7 the rehabilitation of
collectors, 6 the rehabilitation of sub-collectors, and 1 the rehabilitation of
an interceptor.
The following table summarizes all 50 proposed projects.
NUMBER |
NAME |
BENEFITED POPULATION (RESIDENTS) |
DIAMETER (cm) |
PARCIAL LENGTH (m) |
TOTAL LENGTH (m) |
AGE
(YEARS) |
|
1 |
Sub-colector Rampa Buena Vista |
11,089 |
30 |
1310 |
1310 |
32 |
|
2 |
Colector Central |
- |
38 |
941 |
1898 |
32 |
|
61 |
957 |
||||||
3 |
Laterals in Zona Este |
6,024 |
20 |
609 |
760 |
30 |
|
30 |
81 |
||||||
38 |
70 |
||||||
4 |
Lateral in Zona Rio Oriente |
1,380 |
20 |
540 |
597 |
23 |
|
25 |
32 |
||||||
30 |
26 |
||||||
5 |
Subcolector cjón. Serv. 2da.
Oriente, Ciudad Industrial |
1,500 |
30 |
682 |
682 |
26 |
|
6 |
Subcolector av. Alejandro Von
Humbolt Modulo I Otay |
12,069 |
38 |
668 |
668 |
18 |
|
7 |
Laterals in Calle Federico
Gamboa Modulo I Otay |
900 |
20 |
197 |
197 |
18 |
|
8 |
Laterals in Calle Gabriela
Mistral Modulo IV Otay |
675 |
20 |
155 |
155 |
18 |
|
9 |
Laterals in Av. Revolución en Zona
Centro |
770 |
20 |
462 |
462 |
30 |
|
10 |
Colector Oriente in Vía Rápida
de la Zona Río |
76,436 |
122 |
394 |
562 |
8 |
|
61 |
167 |
||||||
11 |
Connection to subcolector
Ejerc. Trigarante Fracc. La Joya |
32,900 |
45 |
86 |
86 |
|
|
12 |
Lasterals in Zona Norte |
450 |
20 |
500 |
500 |
30 |
|
13 |
Laterals in CalleMichoacan and
Mutualismo Zona Norte |
118 |
20 |
574 |
574 |
30 |
|
14 |
Lateral Calle Baja California
Zona Norte |
118 |
25 |
178 |
178 |
30 |
|
15 |
Colector Los Reyes,Los Venados |
25,600 |
45 |
437 |
437 |
10 |
|
16 |
Laterals Av.Universidad Otay
Universidad |
212 |
20 |
276 |
276 |
18 |
|
17 |
Laterals calle Diplomáticos
Otay Universidad |
1,080 |
20 |
533 |
795 |
18 |
|
30 |
262 |
||||||
18 |
Colector Venustiano Carranza |
53,508 |
30 |
278 |
425 |
32 |
|
38 |
147 |
||||||
19 |
Laterals Fracc. El Mirador |
8,542 |
20 |
1013 |
1013 |
25 |
|
20 |
Laterals Zona Centro |
17,181 |
20 |
940 |
1717 |
30 |
|
25 |
777 |
||||||
21 |
Laterals Privada Tarahumaras
Fracc. La Sierra |
144 |
25 |
160 |
160 |
30 |
|
22 |
Laterals Cjón. " Z "
(between 2da. and 3ra. Zona Centro) |
118 |
25 |
155 |
155 |
30 |
|
23 |
Laterals Bulevar Agua Caliente
Fracc. Hipodromo |
2,000 |
20 |
395 |
395 |
30 |
|
24 |
Laterals calle Rio Amazonas
Fracc. Capistrano |
6,369 |
20 |
17 |
95 |
17 |
|
30 |
78 |
||||||
25 |
Laterals Otay Nueva Tijuana,
Modulo I Y II (1ra. Parte) |
7,535 |
20 |
10629 |
11429 |
18 |
|
25 |
800 |
||||||
26 |
Laterals Aviación |
1,837 |
20 |
351 |
351 |
30 |
|
27 |
Laterals Zona Río (1ra. A) |
- |
20 |
6704 |
7738 |
24 |
|
25 |
397 |
||||||
30 |
238 |
||||||
38 |
160 |
||||||
61 |
239 |
||||||
28 |
Subcolector Cañón Guerrero |
8,938 |
Amp.
a 25 |
757 |
757 |
30 |
|
29 |
Laterals Col. Hipódromo |
1485.21 |
20 |
1102 |
1102 |
30 |
|
30 |
Laterals Modulos III y IV Otay |
6,570 |
20 |
8739 |
9882 |
18 |
|
25 |
285 |
||||||
30 |
785 |
||||||
31 |
Colector Industrial |
68,000 |
45 |
237 |
237 |
13 |
|
32 |
Subcolector Cañón González
Bocanegra |
11,017 |
20 |
234 |
821 |
20 |
|
25 |
197 |
||||||
30 |
391 |
||||||
33 |
Laterals Col. Guillen |
1,380 |
20 |
2176 |
2176 |
30 |
|
34 |
Laterals Col. Leos Montoya |
344.00 |
20 |
1214 |
1214 |
30 |
|
35 |
Laterals Zona Río (1ra. B) |
- |
20 |
10056 |
11606 |
24 |
|
25 |
595 |
||||||
30 |
357 |
||||||
38 |
239 |
||||||
61 |
359 |
||||||
36 |
Laterals col. Angélica |
1,020 |
20 |
2012 |
2012 |
25 |
|
37 |
Laterals Zona Este
(inicio-1ra. Parte) |
6,024 |
20 |
5561 |
6841 |
30 |
|
25 |
330 |
||||||
30 |
300 |
||||||
38 |
650 |
||||||
38 |
Laterals Otay Constituyentes |
340 |
20 |
500 |
500 |
18 |
|
39 |
Laterals Zona Central (1ra. A) |
12,026 |
20 |
6000 |
8472 |
30 |
|
25 |
2000 |
||||||
30 |
472 |
||||||
40 |
Laterals Fracc. Soler |
6,789 |
20 |
10409 |
11780 |
25 |
|
25 |
701 |
||||||
30 |
670 |
||||||
41 |
Laterals Zona Norte (Inicio
1ra. Parte) |
- |
20 |
6899 |
7263 |
30 |
|
25 |
363 |
||||||
42 |
Laterals Col. Santa Rosa |
918 |
20 |
968 |
968 |
30 |
|
43 |
Laterals Zona Central (1ra. B) |
12,026 |
20 |
9000 |
12708 |
30 |
|
25 |
3000 |
||||||
30 |
708 |
||||||
44 |
Laterals col. Reforma |
390 |
20 |
275 |
275 |
13 |
|
45 |
Interceptor Poniente
(Arboledas-Los Venados) |
81,804 |
76 |
1000 |
1000 |
9 |
|
46 |
Colector Pasteje |
27,035 |
38 |
53 |
53 |
8 |
|
47 |
Colector Padre Kino |
44,944 |
61 |
1684 |
2227 |
20 |
|
76 |
543 |
||||||
48 |
Laterals Zona Río (2da. A) |
- |
20 |
6704 |
8228 |
24 |
|
|
25 |
397 |
|
||||
|
38 |
238 |
|
||||
|
25 |
356 |
|
||||
|
61 |
534 |
|
||||
49 |
Laterals Zona Río (2da. B) |
- |
20 |
4469 |
5485 |
24 |
|
|
25 |
264 |
|
||||
|
38 |
159 |
|
||||
|
25 |
237 |
|
||||
|
61 |
356 |
|
||||
50 |
Laterals Zona Central (2da. A) |
5,155 |
20 |
1066 |
1620 |
30 |
|
25 |
247 |
||||||
30 |
221 |
||||||
45 |
86 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
TOTAL= |
130,843 |
|
All the proposed projects are located in previously developed areas with
water, wastewater collection, and wastewater treatment service. For the most
part, the lines will be replaced with the same diameter pipe, although in a few
cases the diameteres will be slightly increased to account for past population
growth.
The preferred rehabilitation method is slip lining, which will minimize
traffic disruption by minimizing the amount of excavation needed. Additionally, dust generation, and nuisance
to residents and commercial establishments will be reduced. Finally, the proposed method will be more
cost-effective than conventional excavation methods.
It must be noted that slip-lining may not be possible in some areas,
which will be rehabilitated using conventional excavation methods. It is
assumed as a contingency that approximately 20% of the rehabilitated length
will be done with excavation methods.
4. Compliance with International
Treaties
The project will benefit environmental and human
health conditions on both sides of the border.
The rehabilitation will reduce the risk of wastewater overflows to the
environment.
The proposed works were prioritized by CESPT in close
coordination with BECC, EPA, and the State of California. Prioritization criteria included structural
condition of the lines; overflow, complaints and repair records; wastewater
volume that could potentially be surcharged; and proximity to the Tijuana River
and the border.
1.
Environmental
and Human Health Need
The objective of
this project is to improve environmental and human health conditions in the
city of Tijuana, as well as in areas in the cities of San Diego and Imperial in
the United States near the border, the Tijuana Estuary and the Pacific Ocean.
Tijuana has a long
history of sanitation problems as a result of the conditions of some sewer
lines, the existence of inhabited areas that lack water and sewer service, and
insufficient wastewater treatment capacity.
Currently, CESPT is undertaking a series of sanitation programs aimed at
reducing these problems. Through the Parallel Works project Tijuana will
increase its wastewater conveyance and treatment at the San Antonio de los
Buenos plant. Additionally, an
extensive construction program for sewer systems in currently unserved areas is
being implemented. The proposed project
will be an additional contribution towards solving the sanitation problems of
the city.
The
rehabilitation of sewers will reduce storm and ground water infiltration into
the sewer system, which will in turn reduce wastewater inflow to the treatment
plants, thus increasing the effective treatment capacity. Furthermore, the
potential for the pollution of aquifers and surface waters will be decreased.
Finally,
the project will help relieve the system of current flows generated from
infiltration and overflows to the environment and the Tijuana River.
2.
Environmental
Assessment
In order to gain access to
EPAs Border Environment Infrastructure Fund (BEIF) monies, the project must
comply with the National Environmental
Policy
Act (NEPA) requirements. On June 25,
2001 EPA issued a Categorical Exclusion (CATEX), in which the EPA Regional
Administrator determined that
the
proposed project will not have significant adverse impacts. The NEPA process is completed with this
CATEX. A copy of the CATEX
determination and
the supporting rationale can be found here CATEX
.
3.
Compliance
with Applicable Environmental and Cultural Resources Laws and Regulations
The proposed rehabilitation will take place in previously disturbed
areas and no biological, archaeological or cultural resources will be impacted.
As previously indicated, the rehabilitation method will minimize the need for
excavation. All work will be performed
along existing lines.
1.
Appropriate technology
As previously
indicated, lines will be rehabilitated for the most part by means of the
lip-lining method. This technology will reduce excavation needs and the impact
on traffic patterns and nuisance to residents.
CESPT has experience in the use of this technology.
CESPT
preformed an assessment of the lines to be rehabilitated, which consisted in an
evaluation of overflow, repairs and complaints records; the inspection of all
the manholes in each line; partial inspection by means of T.V. cameras; and
based on the knowledge and experience of the operations staff. Additionally,
hydraulic calculations were performed for each sewer segment.
CESPT
developed the partial design (anteproyectos) for each of the proposed
projects, which include a map with the location of the lines and manholes and
manhole and invert elevations. Additionally, the designs include detailed
construction cost estimates. CESPT is in the process of completing the final
design for all projects.
The
sewer system will continue being operated in the same fashion. Wastewater will continue flowing to the
International and San Antonio de los Buenos wastewater treatment plants.
The
proposed technology is appropriate for the physical conditions of Tijuana and
for the technical and institutional capacity of the operating agency. CESPT has
operations and maintenance crews that perform line cleaning and repairs and
have the appropriate equipment.
2. Operation and maintenance plan
The system will
be operated by CESPT in the same fashion it is currently being operated. Nonetheless, operation and maintenance
requirements will be decreased due to
the reduction of structural problems.
CESPT has crews
for the operation and maintenance of the sewer system.
3. Conformance with applicable deign norms and
regulations
The
partial designs were developed by CESPT in accordance with state and federal
guidelines and regulations.
Financial
Feasibility and Project Administration
1.
Financial feasibility
The total estimated
project cost is Mx$390,734,002, or assuming an exchange rate of Mx$9.30 =
US$1.00, the total cost is US$38,392,477. . The following table summarizes
the cost estimates for the proposed projects.
NUMBER |
NAME |
DIAMETER (cm.) |
PARCIAL LENGTH (ml.) |
TOTAL LENGTH (M.) |
COST (pesos) |
|
1 |
Subcolector
Rampa Buena Vista |
30 |
1,310 |
1,310 |
$3,158,324 |
|
2 |
Colector
Central |
38 |
941 |
1,898 |
$8,951,272 |
|
61 |
957 |
|||||
3 |
Laterals
zona Este |
20 |
609 |
760 |
$1,776,868 |
|
30 |
81 |
|||||
38 |
70 |
|||||
4 |
Laterals
Zona Rio Oriente |
20 |
540 |
597 |
$1,210,898 |
|
25 |
32 |
|||||
30 |
26 |
|||||
5 |
Subcolector cjón. Serv. 2da.
Oriente, Ciudad Industrial |
30 |
682 |
682 |
$1,614,378 |
|
6 |
Subcolector av. Alejandro Von
Humbolt Modulo I Otay |
38 |
668 |
668 |
$1,505,604 |
|
7 |
Laterals calle Federico Gamboa
Modulo I Otay |
20 |
197 |
197 |
$464,932 |
|
8 |
Laterals calle Gabriela
Mistral Modulo IV Otay |
20 |
155 |
155 |
$293,152 |
|
9 |
Laterals Av. Revolución en Zona
Centro |
20 |
462 |
462 |
$902,980 |
|
10 |
Colector Oriente en Vía Rápida
de la Zona Río |
122 |
394 |
562 |
$2,781,113 |
|
61 |
167 |
|||||
11 |
subcolector Ejerc. Trigarante
Fracc. La Joya |
45 |
86 |
86 |
$258,525 |
|
12 |
Laterals Zona Norte |
20 |
500 |
500 |
$977,507 |
|
13 |
Laterals c. Michoacan y
Mutualismo Zona Norte |
20 |
574 |
574 |
$1,113,440 |
|
14 |
Laterals c. Baja California
Zona Norte |
25 |
178 |
178 |
$409,260 |
|
15 |
Colector Los Reyes,Los Venados |
45 |
437 |
437 |
$1,108,499 |
|
16 |
Laterals Av.Universidad Otay
Universidad |
20 |
276 |
276 |
$504,308 |
|
17 |
Laterals calle Diplomáticos
Otay Universidad |
20 |
533 |
795 |
$1,132,897 |
|
30 |
262 |
|||||
18 |
Colector Venustiano Carranza |
30 |
278 |
425 |
$1,622,116 |
|
38 |
147 |
|||||
19 |
Laterals Fracc. El Mirador |
20 |
1,013 |
1,013 |
$1,845,065 |
|
20 |
Laterals Zona Centro |
20 |
940 |
1,717 |
$3,663,229 |
|
25 |
777 |
|||||
21 |
Laterals Privada Tarahumaras
Fracc. La Sierra |
25 |
160 |
160 |
$443,407 |
|
22 |
Laterals Cjón. " Z "
entre 2da. Y 3ra. Zona Centro |
25 |
155 |
155 |
$442,570 |
|
23 |
Laterals Bulevar Agua Caliente
Fracc. Hipodromo |
20 |
395 |
395 |
$969,963 |
|
24 |
Laterals calle Rio Amazonas
Fracc. Capistrano |
20 |
17 |
95 |
$588,461 |
|
30 |
78 |
|||||
25 |
Laterals Otay Nueva Tijuana,
Modulo I Y II (1ra. Parte) |
20 |
10,629 |
11,429 |
$17,903,095 |
|
25 |
800 |
|||||
26 |
Laterals Aviación |
20 |
351 |
351 |
$662,858 |
|
27 |
Laterals Zona Río (1ra. A) |
20 |
6,704 |
7,738 |
$21,187,831 |
|
25 |
397 |
|||||
30 |
238 |
|||||
38 |
160 |
|||||
61 |
239 |
|||||
28 |
Subcolector Cañón Guerrero |
Amp.
a 25 |
757 |
757 |
$1,197,552 |
|
29 |
Laterals col. Hipódromo |
20 |
1,102 |
1,102 |
$1,521,309 |
|
30 |
Laterals Modulos III y IV Otay |
20 |
8,739 |
9,882 |
$15,421,600 |
|
25 |
285 |
|||||
30 |
785 |
|||||
31 |
Colector Industrial |
45 |
237 |
237 |
$1,286,026 |
|
32 |
Subcolector Cañón González
Bocanegra |
20 |
234 |
821 |
$1,837,862 |
|
25 |
197 |
|||||
30 |
391 |
|||||
33 |
Laterals col. Guillen |
20 |
2,176 |
2,176 |
$3,280,517 |
|
34 |
Laterals col. Leos Montoya |
20 |
1,214 |
1,214 |
$1,938,951 |
|
35 |
Laterals Zona Río (1ra. B) |
20 |
10,056 |
11,606 |
$31,781,746 |
|
25 |
595 |
|||||
30 |
357 |
|||||
38 |
239 |
|||||
61 |
359 |
|||||
36 |
Laterals col. Angélica |
20 |
2,012 |
2,012 |
$3,072,524 |
|
37 |
Laterals Zona Este
(inicio-1ra. Parte) |
20 |
5,561 |
6,841 |
$13,532,584 |
|
25 |
330 |
|||||
30 |
300 |
|||||
38 |
650 |
|||||
38 |
R Laterals Otay Constituyentes |
20 |
500 |
500 |
$933,807 |
|
39 |
Laterals Zona Central (1ra. A) |
20 |
6,000 |
8,472 |
$20,456,284 |
|
25 |
2,000 |
|||||
30 |
472 |
|||||
40 |
Laterals Fracc. Soler |
20 |
10,409 |
11,780 |
$15,151,298 |
|
25 |
701 |
|||||
30 |
670 |
|||||
41 |
Laterals Zona Norte (Inicio
1ra. Parte) |
20 |
6,899 |
7,263 |
$15,581,384 |
|
25 |
363 |
|||||
42 |
Laterals col. Santa Rosa |
20 |
968 |
968 |
$1,549,575 |
|
43 |
Laterals Zona Central (1ra. B) |
20 |
9,000 |
12,708 |
$30,684,426 |
|
25 |
3,000 |
|||||
30 |
708 |
|||||
44 |
Laterals col. Reforma |
20 |
275 |
275 |
$471,434 |
|
45 |
Interceptor Poniente
(Arboledas-Los Venados) |
76 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
$9,043,358 |
|
46 |
Colector Pasteje |
38 |
53 |
53 |
$5,175,000 |
|
47 |
Colector Padre Kino |
61 |
1,684 |
2,227 |
$11,308,476 |
|
76 |
543 |
|||||
48 |
Laterals Zona Río (2da. A) |
20 |
6,704 |
8,228 |
$23,225,370 |
|
25 |
397 |
|||||
38 |
238 |
|||||
25 |
356 |
|||||
61 |
534 |
|||||
49 |
Laterals Zona Río (2da. B) |
20 |
4,469 |
5,485 |
$15,483,580 |
|
25 |
264 |
|||||
38 |
159 |
|||||
25 |
237 |
|||||
61 |
356 |
|||||
50 |
Laterals Zona Central (2da. A) |
20 |
1,066 |
1,620 |
$4,790,656 |
|
25 |
247 |
|||||
30 |
221 |
|||||
45 |
86 |
|||||
|
TOTAL = |
|
130,843 |
|
|
|
|
SUTOTAL CONSTRUCCION = |
Mx$306,217,870 |
|
|
||
|
Imprevistos de diseño (10%)= Mx$30,621,787 |
|
|
|
||
|
Supervision (6%) = Mx$18,373,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUB-TOTAL |
Mx$355,212,729 |
|
|
||
|
V.A.T. (10%)
=Mx$35,521,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GRAN TOTAL = MX$390,734,002 |
|
|
|
|
The North American Development Bank (NADB)
developed a financial evaluation that took into consideration the costs of the
project, the debt capacity of the operating agency, the availability of CESPTs
resources, and the availability and eligibility for grant funding. The following table presents the financial
structure recommended by NADB for this project, assuming an exchange rate of
Mx$9.30=US$1.00.
Available funding |
Amount
(dollars) |
% del
Total |
Capital |
|
|
CESPTs contribution |
18,007,204 |
43 |
Capital Sub-total |
18,007,204 |
43 |
Loans |
|
|
NADB loan |
6,000,000 |
14 |
Loans Sub-total |
6,000,000 |
14 |
Grants |
|
|
BDAN (BEIF) |
18,007,204 |
43 |
Grants Sub-total |
18,007,204 |
43 |
TOTAL |
42,014,409 |
100.0 |
2. Rate study
The
financial evaluation developed by NADB includes a rate study. The financial evaluation does not recommend
an increase in rates in real terms. An inflationary
adjustment is recommended.
It
is important to point out that CESPT has a commitment already in place to
increase rates 3% in real terms by the year 2002. This increase will elevate the CESPTs average cost per cubic
meter of potable water to Mx$11.64 to cover debt obligations arising from the
Parallel Works project.
At
this time the average water bill is Mx$98.36.
3. Project
administration
The project will be administered by CESPT, which is in charge of the
operation and maintenance of the water and sewer systems. The implementation of
this project will not affect the way in which CESPT operated the system. CESPTs Construction Department will
supervise the construction.
1. Initiation of the public participation process:
The
process began on November 9, 2000 when BECC delivered to Luis Torres, CESPTs
planning under-director a copy of the public participation guidelines, as well
as other sample documents.
2. Steering Committee: The steering committee was
created on February 8, 2001, in a meeting held at CESPTs office. A board was elected and was formed as
follows:
·
President: José Galicot Behar.
·
Secretary: Héctor Lutteroth Camou
·
Speakers: Arq. Guillermo Caballero, C. Gustavo Beister,
C. Julián Palombo y C. Salvador López.
·
Technical Secretary: Sara H.
Leal Partida, CESPT.
3.
Public Participation Plan: The
Steering Committee submitted to BECC a Public Participation Plan dated March 8,
2001. The Plan was approved by BECC on March
12, 2001.
4. Local Organizations: The Steering Committee has representatives
from 37 local organizations, by which it guarantees representation of the
public at large. Among these organizations are: representatives from different
neighborhoods (low income), professional organizations, business chambers,
social service clubs, representatives from the media, academic institutions,
etc.
5.
Public Information:
Project information has been accessible to the community at the CESPTs
offices. Additionally, over 50 public
meetings have taken place in neighborhoods and schools; flyers have been
distributed; radio shows; radio spots; and meetings with cambers and
clubs.
6. Public meetings:
1st Public
Meeting: this meeting was held on April 7, 2001 at the
facilities of Parque Municipal Morelos, in Tijuana, BC. Approximately 500 people attended the
meeting. Technical aspects of the
project were presented, as well as cost estimates. An exit survey was conducted
to gauge understanding of and support of the project. 95% of those surveyed responded that they support the
project. Of these 71% were women.
2nd Public
Meeting: This meeting will be held on July 20 at the Centro
Cultural Tijuana (CECUT). The financial components of the project will be
presented, including cost estimates, the financial structure, and any potential
rate impacts. Another survey will be applied at the end of the meeting to gauge
support for the project.
1. Definition and
Principles
Sustainable
Development is defined as conservation oriented social and economic development
that emphasizes the protection and sustainable use of resources, while
addressing both current and future needs, and present and future impacts of
human actions, as defined in the Border XXI environmental program developed by
U.S. and Mexican authorities.
According
to the above definition of sustainable development, the Improvements and
Rehabilitation of the Sewer System of Tijuana, B.C., meets the principle of
conservation oriented social and economic development that emphasizes the
protection and sustainable use of natural resources, addressing current needs
without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
Principle
1
establishes that human beings are at the center of concerns for sustainable
development and are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with
nature. This principle will be met because the project will promote a reduction
in the number of diseases that directly relate to potential wastewater
infiltration into soil and ground water, as well as, raw sewage spills during
the rain season.
Principle 2 states the right to development so as to
equitably meet developmental and environmental needs of present and future
generations. This principle is met by this project in that it ensures sewer
services for current and future residents, ensuring thus environmental
protection for future generations.
Principle 3 is fulfilled with the reduction of potential
soil and ground water contamination due to wastewater leaks from pipes in poor
condition, as well as the pollution of the Tijuana River as the result of
sewage spills.
Principle 4 discusses the interest of stakeholders in any
activity related to this wastewater project. This principle has been met by
implementing the aforesaid community participation program.
b. Institutional and Human Capacity Building.
Actions
considered by the project will help Tijuanas Municipal Government to
strengthen its capacity in the following areas.
·
The revamping of
installed collecting capacity with the rehabilitation of approximately 131,000
meters of sewer lines.
·
The rehabilitation of sewer lines will help to reduce potential
infiltration of storm waters and/or ground water, reducing the flows that
wastewater treatment plants receive, extending the lifetime capacity of the
existing and future facilities.
c. Conformance with Applicable Local and
Regional Conservation and Development Plans.
The project
meets guidelines established by the following federal, state and local plans:
Tijuanas Master Plan for the Improvement of
Water, Wastewater, and Sanitation services. The project supplement the goals for consolidation and expansion of the
Tijuana Water Utility services, considered in the Master Plan that in currently
under development.
Water, Sewer, and Sanitation Program. This program was implemented by the Federal
government in 1990 and has an objective: to meet existing deficiencies and
demands arising for population growth in the areas of potable water, wastewater
collection, institutional development at the municipal, state and federal level
to promote environmental protection by reducing wastewater pollution.
1996-2001 Baja California
State Urban Development Plan, Secretariat of Human
Settlements and Public Works
This document states the need to build and to
consolidate infrastructure for wastewater collection and treatment in the five
municipalities and in the states regional centers.
Comprehensive Environmental
Program for the Northern Border (PIAF)
Based on guidelines established by the National
Development Plan and corresponding Sector Programs. Addresses guidelines
established to clean up the countrys Northern Border.
d. Natural Resource
Conservation.
Improving
wastewater collection infrastructure
will in turn improve environmental quality, especially soils,
groundwater, and surface water, as is the case of the Tijuana River.
e. Community Development.
If sewer lines are not rehabilitated, several environmental and human
health threats will continue being present.
Lines will continue deteriorating.
Leak repairs will impact traffic and the use of valuable resources
towards that end. Additionally, during
the wet season wastewater overflows will continue, creating a human health and
environmental problem.
Solving
the problems previously mentioned will improve the quality of life.